![]() I had to manually adjust the levels all over the place, sometimes at note levels, even with the expander. I also have to do the same sort of things to an electric keyboard, though - the dynamics on those are really bad and it took me hours to get one sounding good on a single demo song we recorded over the weekend. I've tried a few different things like adding an exciter and an expander pre-amp EQ/pre-compression and it improved things a little, but I'm not good enough at mixing to really do a good job on it. This is my personal biggest complaint about using them. This is a pro AND a con.Īnything beyond the tiniest bit of distortion sounds like crap if you're trying to emulate a real amp, even with good modelers.ĭynamics suffer a lot when you don't have the speaker in the room pushing air and interacting with the guitar. It's convenient, quiet, and almost guarantees a clean take free of the vagaries of mic placement, phase issues, and environmental noise. You can change the amp sound AFTER you record the basic track in ways that go beyond simple EQ. Okay, here's the pros and cons to models as I see them: The results did not favor the snobs, I'll tell you that. Incidentally, JustNick did a blind test whether people used to hearing it could distinguish between solid state/pedal distortion and amp distortion. I don't use a lot of dirt, and when I do, it's fuzz anyway, not amp distortion. Although I'm aware that there are better amp sims out there, I've decided that basically they're not going to get an overdrive sound right enough for me to worry about it. I've been using Logic's amp modelers for my home recordings. If I'm feeling adventurous, I'll use a freebie vst ampsim (lepou, acmebargig, ect) and a cab impulse or two (I have recabinet, amongst a stack of others), but really. ![]() It's just a good basic rock amp, and I have a sneaking suspicion it's on all the tracks I have on that soundcloud page in some capacity. That plugin is nearly a standard go-to for me when I'm tracking guitars. Go on, have a listen and tell me which one is the VST. 7 years ago at least, so I don't think you'll find the thread on the nTrack forum anymore, BUT, you can hear it here: I'm not sure ultimately what that means - maybe I did a crap job of recording the amp, maybe it's just a crap amp to start with, but I think the point is that it's not necessarily the source, it's the context. wrong, because they thought they could hear the cab resonance they programmed into the plugin on the real-amp channel. The results were about 50/50 correct/wrong iirc, but I also invited the plugin designers to have a listen. ![]() I then posted the mix on the ntrack forum to see if people could tell the which was which in the context of the mix. I once did a comparo using SimulAnalogue JCM800 plugin by putting that on the (?) channel, mixed 100% to that side, and my miced VS102r (a marshall valvestate amp) 100% on the other on a complete song. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |